Conservation Reserve Program in Whitman County, Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 968
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $8,812,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Dennis Wagner | Farmington, WA 99128 | $21,796 |
122 | K-d-d Hay LLC | Pullman, WA 99163 | $21,782 |
123 | Sixj Farms, LLC | Cheney, WA 99004 | $21,754 |
124 | Chad Fleming | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $21,747 |
125 | Damon Filan | Kennewick, WA 99338 | $21,701 |
126 | Diamond T Ranches Inc | Sprague, WA 99032 | $21,432 |
127 | Mckay Farm & Ranch Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $21,146 |
128 | Rodney D Bryan | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $20,482 |
129 | Cochran Partnership | Pullman, WA 99163 | $20,247 |
130 | Edgar L Smith Inc | Colfax, WA 99111 | $20,213 |
131 | Willada Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $20,131 |
132 | Flying F Farms LLC | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $20,032 |
133 | Loren Fleming | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $19,992 |
134 | Clark Collins & Clark Gp | Pullman, WA 99163 | $19,891 |
135 | Albert E Schauble | Saint John, WA 99171 | $19,697 |
136 | Brenda Camp | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $19,592 |
137 | Juno View Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $19,528 |
138 | Laritz Farms Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $19,461 |
139 | Cook Special Needs Tr Dtd 2-5-2021 | Pasco, WA 99301 | $19,268 |
140 | G Belsby Family Inc | Cheney, WA 99004 | $19,105 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”