Direct Payment Program in Whitman County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,476
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $145,742,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steve Gfeller Inc | Thornton, WA 99176 | $360,466 |
42 | Fleener Enterprises | Pullman, WA 99163 | $360,257 |
43 | Larry K Brown | Thornton, WA 99176 | $359,696 |
44 | Leonard G Aune II | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $359,443 |
45 | Kincaid Partners General Partnership | Pullman, WA 99163 | $358,138 |
46 | Cronk Farms Inc | Garfield, WA 99130 | $357,097 |
47 | Fulfs Bros Farms Gp | Pullman, WA 99163 | $353,718 |
48 | Hollingsworth Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $351,003 |
49 | Ronald E Brown | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $346,999 |
50 | Eden Valley Jv | Garfield, WA 99130 | $346,050 |
51 | Curtis Farms Inc | Thornton, WA 99176 | $344,991 |
52 | Teade Farms Gp | Colfax, WA 99111 | $341,721 |
53 | Bmc Farms Gp | Oakesdale, WA 99158 | $341,344 |
54 | James Bailey Inc | Lamont, WA 99017 | $341,208 |
55 | R A W Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $339,206 |
56 | Repp Farms Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $338,924 |
57 | Swannack Farms Inc | Lamont, WA 99017 | $333,757 |
58 | Steven F Zimmer | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $332,044 |
59 | Jim Bauer & Sons Frm Inc | Uniontown, WA 99179 | $329,951 |
60 | Bernie Schultheis | Colton, WA 99113 | $329,889 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”