Farm Subsidy information
Yakima County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Yakima County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 758
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yakima County, Washington totaled $70,927,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sauve & Son Farms Inc | Mabton, WA 98935 | $305,250 |
42 | Yakama Land Enterprise | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $300,326 |
43 | Cattle Ranch LLC | Yakima, WA 98907 | $292,373 |
44 | Hollingbery Farm LLC | Wapato, WA 98951 | $280,014 |
45 | Matson Fruit Co Inc | Selah, WA 98942 | $253,125 |
46 | Squirrel Ranch LLC | Yakima, WA 98907 | $251,687 |
47 | Simpson Brothers Farms Inc | Mabton, WA 98935 | $251,495 |
48 | Green Acre Farms Inc | Harrah, WA 98933 | $250,000 |
49 | Brulotte Farms Inc | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $250,000 |
50 | Olympic Orchards Inc | Yakima, WA 98901 | $250,000 |
51 | Shinn & Son Inc | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $250,000 |
52 | Monson Royal Orchard LLC | Selah, WA 98942 | $250,000 |
53 | Geertsma Farms LLC | Mabton, WA 98935 | $250,000 |
54 | Golob Farms LLC | Granger, WA 98932 | $250,000 |
55 | Two Bluffs LLC | Yakima, WA 98903 | $250,000 |
56 | Lfz Orchards, LLC | Selah, WA 98942 | $250,000 |
57 | Cornerstone Ranches LLC | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $250,000 |
58 | J2 Cattle Co Inc | Outlook, WA 98938 | $247,081 |
59 | George Deruyter And Son Dairy LLC | Outlook, WA 98938 | $244,804 |
60 | Pro Orchard Management LLC | Yakima, WA 98904 | $241,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”