Farm Subsidy information
Yakima County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Yakima County, Washington, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 406
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yakima County, Washington totaled $50,006,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mc Cormick Farms LLC | Selah, WA 98942 | $187,758 |
42 | River Valley Orchards LLC | Benton City, WA 99320 | $185,118 |
43 | Sierra Vista Farm Management LLC | Yakima, WA 98903 | $182,858 |
44 | Mark La Pierre Farms LLC | Zillah, WA 98953 | $181,751 |
45 | Lowell L Lancaster | Selah, WA 98942 | $172,052 |
46 | Chief Ranch LLC | Yakima, WA 98908 | $161,810 |
47 | Egt Orchards LLC | Yakima, WA 98908 | $160,941 |
48 | , | $159,609 | |
49 | Noe Mendez-gonzalez | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $157,088 |
50 | Strand Apples Too LLC | Cowiche, WA 98923 | $156,299 |
51 | Victory Farms Management LLC | Yakima, WA 98903 | $155,141 |
52 | Pro Orchard Management LLC | Yakima, WA 98904 | $152,438 |
53 | , | $141,649 | |
54 | Wooden Shoe LLC | Outlook, WA 98938 | $139,193 |
55 | Wenas Hop Company LLC | Yakima, WA 98907 | $137,500 |
56 | F M F Inc | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $136,576 |
57 | Eduardo Mendez LLC | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $135,903 |
58 | Roger Strand | Cowiche, WA 98923 | $135,506 |
59 | Plath Orchards LLC | Yakima, WA 98907 | $134,199 |
60 | Gilbert Orchard Inc | Yakima, WA 98909 | $131,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”