Farm Subsidy information
Yakima County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Yakima County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,680
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yakima County, Washington totaled $585,523,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Yakama Land Enterprise | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $1,078,224 |
42 | Naron J Berg | Sunnyside, WA 98944 | $1,073,801 |
43 | Bureau Of Indian Affairs | Winnebago, NE 68071 | $1,058,623 |
44 | Bill Deruyter | Sunnyside, WA 98944 | $1,058,392 |
45 | Rowe Farms Inc | Naches, WA 98937 | $1,040,627 |
46 | Castle Grove Dairy LLC | Wapato, WA 98951 | $1,030,686 |
47 | Double P Dairy LLC | Mabton, WA 98935 | $1,029,422 |
48 | Mistletoe Corporation | White Swan, WA 98952 | $1,026,680 |
49 | Jean Sharpe | Spokane, WA 99208 | $1,024,012 |
50 | Upland Vineyards LLC | Outlook, WA 98938 | $1,009,543 |
51 | Sagemoor Vineyards LLC | Naches, WA 98937 | $995,589 |
52 | Geertsma Farms LLC | Mabton, WA 98935 | $993,949 |
53 | Inaba Produce Farms Inc | Wapato, WA 98951 | $985,972 |
54 | Cherry River Farms Inc | Moxee, WA 98936 | $979,150 |
55 | Majestic Farms LLC | Outlook, WA 98938 | $948,985 |
56 | Zine Badissy | Kirkland, WA 98033 | $927,520 |
57 | Najiba Badissy | Kirkland, WA 98033 | $924,673 |
58 | Jim J Sharpe | Astoria, OR 97103 | $900,634 |
59 | Jbjcm Partnership | Lacey, WA 98516 | $900,583 |
60 | Jls Dairy LLC | Sunnyside, WA 98944 | $898,367 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”