Total Commodity Programs in Yakima County, Washington, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,994
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yakima County, Washington totaled $247,090,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gea Llp | Yakima, WA 98909 | $868,998 |
42 | Double R Hop Ranches Inc | Harrah, WA 98933 | $856,963 |
43 | Inaba Produce Farms Inc | Wapato, WA 98951 | $835,409 |
44 | Mains Brothers Farms | Mabton, WA 98935 | $819,144 |
45 | Simpson Brothers Farms Inc | Mabton, WA 98935 | $809,381 |
46 | Jls Dairy LLC | Sunnyside, WA 98944 | $805,056 |
47 | Harris Farms Inc | Moxee, WA 98936 | $781,144 |
48 | Chiawana Orchards LLC | Yakima, WA 98902 | $774,051 |
49 | Sundquist Fruit & Cld Stg Inc | Yakima, WA 98907 | $773,002 |
50 | Cascade View Fruit & Cold Storage | Selah, WA 98942 | $772,705 |
51 | El Rancho Bella Vista LLC | Outlook, WA 98938 | $769,854 |
52 | Cowin & Sons LLC | Wapato, WA 98951 | $762,799 |
53 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $760,918 |
54 | Upland Vineyards LLC | Outlook, WA 98938 | $750,310 |
55 | T&d Dairy LLC | Prosser, WA 99350 | $750,000 |
56 | Ken Wilcox | Wapato, WA 98951 | $749,294 |
57 | Haringa Dairy Inc | Sunnyside, WA 98944 | $745,494 |
58 | Highview Inc | Zillah, WA 98953 | $736,041 |
59 | Virgil Gamache Farms Inc | Toppenish, WA 98948 | $733,734 |
60 | George Deruyter And Son Dairy LLC | Outlook, WA 98938 | $708,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”