Market Loss Assistance Program in West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,312
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in West Virginia totaled $9,505,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dale Nibert Farms | Apple Grove, WV 25502 | $142,438 |
2 | Avon Hill Farms Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $126,939 |
3 | Oakwood Farm LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $115,012 |
4 | Burns Farm | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $109,908 |
5 | Elmwood Farm | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $95,731 |
6 | Lyle C Tabb & Sons Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $84,156 |
7 | Ward Thomas & Sons Inc | Bruceton Mills, WV 26525 | $80,725 |
8 | R Z Bane Inc | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $78,532 |
9 | Michael W Wolpert | Hurricane, WV 25526 | $77,618 |
10 | Renick C Williams | Moorefield, WV 26836 | $73,292 |
11 | Hy-crest Farms LLC | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $71,722 |
12 | Gruber Farms | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $70,290 |
13 | Zigler Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $66,270 |
14 | Lovers Lane Farms | Moorefield, WV 26836 | $63,788 |
15 | Linton Brothers Inc | Martinsburg, WV 25403 | $63,044 |
16 | Linger Farms Inc | Huttonsville, WV 26273 | $62,644 |
17 | James T Blue & Sons Inc | Shenandoah Junction, WV 25442 | $61,718 |
18 | Oldtown Farm Inc | Point Pleasant, WV 25550 | $59,841 |
19 | Nancy & Doug Stolipher And Mark S | Rippon, WV 25441 | $57,548 |
20 | Harry M Kable | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $57,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>