Loan Deficiency in Jefferson County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 144
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Jefferson County, West Virginia totaled $2,985,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Burns Farm | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $266,158 |
2 | Oakwood Farm LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $192,637 |
3 | Riggs & Stiles Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $177,653 |
4 | Lyle C Tabb & Sons Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $170,816 |
5 | Drilake Farm Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $156,648 |
6 | R Z Bane Inc | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $123,199 |
7 | Stanley W Dunn Jr | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $115,396 |
8 | Gruber Farms | Summit Point, WV 25446 | $114,943 |
9 | Shady Grove Farm LLC | Rippon, WV 25441 | $97,537 |
10 | Zigler Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $87,019 |
11 | Nancy & Doug Stolipher And Mark S | Rippon, WV 25441 | $85,452 |
12 | Henry B Davenport III | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $70,946 |
13 | Adams Bros | Rippon, WV 25441 | $70,604 |
14 | James T Blue & Sons Inc | Shenandoah Junction, WV 25442 | $63,262 |
15 | T L Magaha & Sons Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $54,245 |
16 | Wilbob Farms, Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $51,002 |
17 | R Michael Magaha | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $49,733 |
18 | William A Knighten | Shepherdstown, WV 25443 | $49,082 |
19 | Avon Hill Farms Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $46,624 |
20 | W O Lloyd Farms LLC | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $46,285 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>