Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Lincoln County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 115
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Lincoln County, West Virginia totaled $60,504 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Caudle Plumley | Branchland, WV 25506 | $370 |
42 | Teddy G Wade | Hamlin, WV 25523 | $369 |
43 | F M Hatfield | Culloden, WV 25510 | $360 |
44 | James V Alford | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $351 |
45 | Jason Woodall | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $343 |
46 | Ransford L Vickers | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $339 |
47 | James R Linville | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $324 |
48 | Lola Alford | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $324 |
49 | Paul J Thompson | Harts, WV 25524 | $293 |
50 | Forest Monk | Hamlin, WV 25523 | $287 |
51 | Floyd Rice | Griffithsville, WV 25521 | $284 |
52 | Clinton W Lucas | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $282 |
53 | Jo Ann Barrett | Hamlin, WV 25523 | $281 |
54 | Ronnie Keaton | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $276 |
55 | Kenneth A Jones | Griffithsville, WV 25521 | $252 |
56 | Keith A Meadows | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $248 |
57 | Buster Stowers | Griffithsville, WV 25521 | $243 |
58 | Michael Meadows | Alkol, WV 25501 | $236 |
59 | Billy D Stowers | Griffithsville, WV 25521 | $235 |
60 | John A Ramey | West Hamlin, WV 25571 | $232 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”