Farm Subsidy information
Pendleton County, West Virginia
Total Subsidies in Pendleton County, West Virginia, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pendleton County, West Virginia totaled $2,582,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Redbud Acres, LLC | Sugar Grove, WV 26815 | $250,000 |
2 | Mallow Farms | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $198,995 |
3 | Conrad Farms Incorporated | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $95,641 |
4 | F Ray Heavener | Circleville, WV 26804 | $80,678 |
5 | Hotts Farming Inc | Ft Seybert, WV 26802 | $72,995 |
6 | Isaiah J Smith | Keyser, WV 26726 | $57,171 |
7 | Heavner Farms LLC | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $53,174 |
8 | Gregory A Dyer | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $47,237 |
9 | Matthew B Harper | Seneca Rocks, WV 26884 | $38,652 |
10 | John W Mccoy | Franklin, WV 26807 | $37,091 |
11 | Paul C Bennett | Sugar Grove, WV 26815 | $35,584 |
12 | Adamson Farms Inc | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $33,531 |
13 | A & B Livestock, Inc. | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $32,139 |
14 | Roy D Hevener | Franklin, WV 26807 | $30,217 |
15 | Douglas H Wimer Jr | Seneca Rocks, WV 26884 | $29,337 |
16 | Merlin P Harper | Riverton, WV 26814 | $27,130 |
17 | Dennis E Mitchell | Franklin, WV 26807 | $25,512 |
18 | Allegheny Farms LLC Of Seneca Rocks | Seneca Rocks, WV 26884 | $24,778 |
19 | Carl Hevener | Franklin, WV 26807 | $24,029 |
20 | Wanda Harman | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $23,384 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>