Farm Subsidy information
Pocahontas County, West Virginia
Total Subsidies in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 655
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pocahontas County, West Virginia totaled $6,476,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Henry Burr | Marlinton, WV 24954 | $8,697 |
162 | Timothy W Vanreenen | Hillsboro, WV 24946 | $8,382 |
163 | David W. Beverage Sr | Buckeye, WV 24924 | $8,341 |
164 | Maxie A Gum | Green Bank, WV 24944 | $8,264 |
165 | Eugene M Simmons | Hillsboro, WV 24946 | $8,214 |
166 | Gladys K Mann | Cass, WV 24927 | $8,211 |
167 | Seneca Farm | Buckeye, WV 24924 | $8,198 |
168 | David Lynn Vandevender | Durbin, WV 26264 | $8,182 |
169 | Beckwith Lumber Co Inc | Slatyfork, WV 26291 | $8,129 |
170 | Spencer Cole Mccoy | Hillsboro, WV 24946 | $7,928 |
171 | James P Arbogast Estate | Circleville, WV 26804 | $7,879 |
172 | Marshall W Tracy | Arbovale, WV 24915 | $7,864 |
173 | Silas L Sattler | Green Bank, WV 24944 | $7,779 |
174 | Donald W Lovelace | Marlinton, WV 24954 | $7,710 |
175 | Stella L Callison | Hillsboro, WV 24946 | $7,660 |
176 | George P Sovick III | Dunbar, WV 25064 | $7,439 |
177 | Steven William Beard | Hillsboro, WV 24946 | $7,427 |
178 | Wilma Warner | Durbin, WV 26264 | $7,387 |
179 | Jerry E Taylor | Dunmore, WV 24934 | $7,323 |
180 | Johnnie B Hill Estate | Hillsboro, WV 24946 | $7,249 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”