Farm Subsidy information
Randolph County, West Virginia
Total Subsidies in Randolph County, West Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 493
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Randolph County, West Virginia totaled $4,759,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Linger Farms Inc | Huttonsville, WV 26273 | $703,211 |
2 | Harry H Cupp III | Elkins, WV 26241 | $401,964 |
3 | Wv Department Of Agriculture And | Charleston, WV 25312 | $148,552 |
4 | Zachary Dale Teter | Beverly, WV 26253 | $140,700 |
5 | Mill Creek Builders Supply Inc | Mill Creek, WV 26280 | $134,631 |
6 | Snyder Farms | Huttonsville, WV 26273 | $84,498 |
7 | Schmidlens Willow Bend Farm | Elkins, WV 26241 | $81,639 |
8 | Mark Warner | Dailey, WV 26259 | $75,403 |
9 | Bragunier Farms Inc | Clear Spring, MD 21722 | $58,280 |
10 | Hayes Scott Fence And Lumber Inc | Mill Creek, WV 26280 | $57,644 |
11 | Hubert Teter II | Beverly, WV 26253 | $54,499 |
12 | Ara Logging, LLC | Elkins, WV 26241 | $52,875 |
13 | Circle D Timber, Inc. | Beverly, WV 26253 | $52,875 |
14 | R. Petrice Logging | Coalton, WV 26257 | $52,875 |
15 | Mlt Trucking LLC | Huttonsville, WV 26273 | $52,875 |
16 | J&j Trucking | Mill Creek, WV 26280 | $52,875 |
17 | Ridgeline Timber LLC | Montrose, WV 26283 | $52,875 |
18 | James A Dean | Beverly, WV 26253 | $52,853 |
19 | Jay Wallace | Elkins, WV 26241 | $48,197 |
20 | Clifford Mullenax | Montrose, WV 26283 | $42,995 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>