Emergency Conservation Program in Wayne County, West Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 61
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Wayne County, West Virginia totaled $134,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Henry F Maynard | Wayne, WV 25570 | $1,000 |
42 | Gregory Thompson | Genoa, WV 25517 | $992 |
43 | Norman Davis | Fort Gay, WV 25514 | $961 |
44 | Robert A Mcsweeney | Wayne, WV 25570 | $950 |
45 | Gene R Hirosky | Huntington, WV 25704 | $948 |
46 | Robert Lee Neal | Huntington, WV 25704 | $931 |
47 | Terry L Vanderpool | Fort Gay, WV 25514 | $832 |
48 | Golden Vaughn | Genoa, WV 25517 | $740 |
49 | Toby Shy | Huntington, WV 25704 | $697 |
50 | Golden Bartram Jr | Fort Gay, WV 25514 | $595 |
51 | Lewis Nelson | Huntington, WV 25704 | $579 |
52 | Dana W Adkins | Prichard, WV 25555 | $576 |
53 | Delano Davis | East Lynn, WV 25512 | $500 |
54 | Raymond Guarnieri | Prichard, WV 25555 | $426 |
55 | Paul E Stephens | Wayne, WV 25570 | $400 |
56 | Charles Workman | Fort Gay, WV 25514 | $375 |
57 | Willie Jackson Jr | Fort Gay, WV 25514 | $360 |
58 | Marc A Workman | Fort Gay, WV 25514 | $359 |
59 | Donna May | Prichard, WV 25555 | $345 |
60 | Charles Howard Mccagg Jr | Prichard, WV 25555 | $195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”