Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Wetzel County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 77
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Wetzel County, West Virginia totaled $40,918 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Larry Kirkland | Proctor, WV 26055 | $329 |
42 | Paul Blake | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $311 |
43 | Lewis N Wykert Jr | Wileyville, WV 26186 | $294 |
44 | George M Maury | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $293 |
45 | Kenneth Cozart | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $288 |
46 | Maxine Henderson | Littleton, WV 26581 | $284 |
47 | Ray Sapp | Littleton, WV 26581 | $275 |
48 | Steve Young | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $269 |
49 | William B Francik | Cockeysville, MD 21030 | $266 |
50 | Martin Whiteman | Littleton, WV 26581 | $264 |
51 | Robert W Greathouse | Littleton, WV 26581 | $262 |
52 | Roberta L Robinson | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $252 |
53 | Robert Bassett | Reader, WV 26167 | $234 |
54 | Walter J Henthorn Jr | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $231 |
55 | Helen K Bickerstaff | Pine Grove, WV 26419 | $230 |
56 | Larry Pegg | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $229 |
57 | Leslie G Bassett | Reader, WV 26167 | $225 |
58 | Ralph G Dulaney Sr | Jacksonburg, WV 26377 | $224 |
59 | Danny Neff | New Martinsville, WV 26155 | $221 |
60 | Ruth Koontz | Littleton, WV 26581 | $212 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”