Farm Subsidy information
Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 17,255
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wisconsin totaled $416,648,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gumz Muck Farms LLC | Endeavor, WI 53930 | $285,072 |
22 | Wisconsin Moss Co Inc | Babcock, WI 54413 | $277,510 |
23 | Paramount Ag Inc | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $273,669 |
24 | Jagiello Farms & Trucking LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $266,177 |
25 | Bradly George Schmidt | Shawano, WI 54166 | $260,907 |
26 | Jacobs Brothers | De Pere, WI 54115 | $258,417 |
27 | Dandy Creek Cranberries LLC | Necedah, WI 54646 | $258,204 |
28 | Lone Wolf Grain LLC | Monroe, WI 53566 | $249,846 |
29 | Shiloh Dairy LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $242,037 |
30 | Wolf L & G Farms LLC | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $238,562 |
31 | Miller Cranberry Co Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $236,688 |
32 | N & K Ginseng LLC | Schofield, WI 54476 | $236,143 |
33 | Woggon Farms LLC | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $225,596 |
34 | Manthey Farms LLC | Pardeeville, WI 53954 | $221,301 |
35 | Meadowlark Dairy LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $215,907 |
36 | Nehls Bros Farms Ltd | Juneau, WI 53039 | $212,492 |
37 | Gardner Cranberry LLC | Pittsville, WI 54466 | $209,734 |
38 | Neil G Cassity | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $209,184 |
39 | S&s Cropping Enterprises | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $208,812 |
40 | Paragon Farms LLC | Charleston, MO 63834 | $207,179 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”