Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Wisconsin, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 201 to 220 of 3,236

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $19,646,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
201David A NihlesLancaster, WI 53813$18,850
202George W AndrewEvansville, WI 53536$18,844
203Gordon W AndrewJanesville, WI 53548$18,844
204Gary H NeumannMedford, WI 54451$18,782
205James N FiegelMarkesan, WI 53946$18,721
206Jerome M AnthonyCuba City, WI 53807$18,713
207George KaiserMilwaukee, WI 53202$18,487
208Dennis Lee HintzChilton, WI 53014$18,481
209Gary R KrausJanesville, WI 53546$18,419
210Randy J SchmidtAppleton, WI 54913$18,257
211Kenneth KohnCecil, WI 54111$18,256
212Dan L SpurleyLinden, WI 53553$18,189
213Darrin J StingleBlack Creek, WI 54106$18,179
214John A WeisJanesville, WI 53548$18,169
215Krumwiede Farms LLCEvansville, WI 53536$18,159
216Peter L ParkerJanesville, WI 53548$18,129
217Country View Dairy Farms IncGreenville, WI 54942$17,978
218David MikelsonNelson, WI 54756$17,825
219Steve CernekGratiot, WI 53541$17,745
220Harvey H GreinertJanesville, WI 53546$17,740

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag