Biomass Crop Assistance Program in Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 172
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $3,614,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Rock Thums Trucking LLC | Medford, WI 54451 | $8,567 |
62 | Ringer Bulldozing Inc | Sheldon, WI 54766 | $8,537 |
63 | Flannery & Flannery Logging | Antigo, WI 54409 | $8,201 |
64 | Tritz Forest Products LLC | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $8,146 |
65 | D & D Mechanized Pulping | Black River Falls, WI 54615 | $7,875 |
66 | Venzke Logging | Athens, WI 54411 | $7,681 |
67 | Tigerton Lumber Co | Tigerton, WI 54486 | $7,632 |
68 | James A Poyda | Medford, WI 54451 | $7,275 |
69 | James Grezenski Forest Products I | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $7,076 |
70 | Sorensen Trucking Inc | Bruce, WI 54819 | $7,062 |
71 | Randy B Crank | Holcombe, WI 54745 | $6,977 |
72 | Randy Mckee Trucking Inc | Argonne, WI 54511 | $6,957 |
73 | Frank's Inc | Peshtigo, WI 54157 | $6,949 |
74 | Schreiber Trucking And Logging In | Wausau, WI 54403 | $6,593 |
75 | Besse Wood Products Inc | Gladstone, MI 49837 | $6,568 |
76 | Donald Solin | Deerbrook, WI 54424 | $6,158 |
77 | Mark A Smugala | Catawba, WI 54515 | $6,050 |
78 | Mh Forestry | Gresham, WI 54128 | $5,625 |
79 | Nohr-way Logging | Cornell, WI 54732 | $5,580 |
80 | Wesley Bushor LLC | Tomahawk, WI 54487 | $5,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”