Loan Deficiency in Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 41,671
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Wisconsin totaled $721,522,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Skaar Scattered Ac Inc | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $336,241 |
62 | James J Casey | Randolph, WI 53956 | $335,035 |
63 | Robert J Miller Jr | Oconomowoc, WI 53066 | $335,013 |
64 | Kenneth P Luety | Clinton, WI 53525 | $334,720 |
65 | Marcia P Luety | Clinton, WI 53525 | $334,720 |
66 | Brooks & Morris Farms Inc | Oconomowoc, WI 53066 | $333,794 |
67 | Arndt Farms Inc | Janesville, WI 53546 | $329,868 |
68 | James G Reu | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $327,926 |
69 | S & S Grain Farms Partnership | Rio, WI 53960 | $326,439 |
70 | Hein Farms | Columbus, WI 53925 | $319,041 |
71 | Falkers Farms | Viroqua, WI 54665 | $318,070 |
72 | New Age Custom Farming LLC | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $317,921 |
73 | Reeb Farms Inc | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $315,820 |
74 | Mcmillan Farms Inc | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $313,881 |
75 | Alan Peter Droessler | Cuba City, WI 53807 | $311,672 |
76 | Sunset Farms Inc | Allenton, WI 53002 | $310,450 |
77 | Haberli Farms Inc | Egg Harbor, WI 54209 | $310,270 |
78 | William Harold Beskar | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $309,887 |
79 | Kuiper Family Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $309,408 |
80 | Pauline Marilyn Beskar | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $307,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”