Farm Subsidy information
Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 143,113
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wisconsin totaled $12,667,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Ter Rae Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,824,230 |
82 | Bollant Farms Inc | Stitzer, WI 53825 | $2,807,991 |
83 | Miltrim Farms Inc | Athens, WI 54411 | $2,804,949 |
84 | Danes Fairylane Dairy Farm Inc | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $2,803,987 |
85 | Gunderson Grain Farms | Waterford, WI 53185 | $2,780,981 |
86 | Jeffrey A Potter | Exeland, WI 54835 | $2,751,571 |
87 | Shamrock Farms | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $2,747,562 |
88 | Jagiello Farms & Trucking LLC | Lena, WI 54139 | $2,744,504 |
89 | R & C Hawkins Farms | Bristol, WI 53104 | $2,744,052 |
90 | Mcclellan Farms Inc | Delavan, WI 53115 | $2,725,780 |
91 | Patricia M Dufek | New Franken, WI 54229 | $2,720,284 |
92 | Clover Hill Dairy LLC | Campbellsport, WI 53010 | $2,717,079 |
93 | Burnside Dairy Inc | Durand, WI 54736 | $2,710,793 |
94 | Abel Dairy Farms LLC | Eden, WI 53019 | $2,704,755 |
95 | Fetzer Farms Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $2,700,916 |
96 | Schairer Farms Inc | Birnamwood, WI 54414 | $2,687,372 |
97 | Christiana Farms | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $2,682,754 |
98 | Ulrich Farms Inc | Dresser, WI 54009 | $2,671,503 |
99 | El-na Farms LLC | Algoma, WI 54201 | $2,668,304 |
100 | Van Dyk Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,665,263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”