Conservation Reserve Program in Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 8,370
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $34,308,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Larry L Yager - Larry L Yager Irrevocable Trust Da | Potosi, WI 53820 | $32,347 |
102 | Reynolds Brothers Farms LLC | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $32,208 |
103 | , | $32,205 | |
104 | Joseph M Kirschbaum | Bloomington, WI 53804 | $31,613 |
105 | John R Naughton | Dodgeville, WI 53533 | $31,546 |
106 | Gloria Belken | Montfort, WI 53569 | $31,530 |
107 | Green Hills LLC | Menomonee Falls, WI 53051 | $31,520 |
108 | Greg M Siedschlag Exempt Trust Created Under Sieds | Plymouth, MN 55446 | $31,288 |
109 | Will Broge | Gratiot, WI 53541 | $31,051 |
110 | William G Campbell | Fennimore, WI 53809 | $31,005 |
111 | Joanne Patterman | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $30,850 |
112 | Ralph Patterman | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $30,850 |
113 | Kunkel Living Trust | Hazel Green, WI 53811 | $30,807 |
114 | Gregory R Le Gare | Osseo, WI 54758 | $30,761 |
115 | Dale L & Sharon A Schluter Liv Tr | Livingston, WI 53554 | $30,728 |
116 | Smock Valley LLC | Monroe, WI 53566 | $30,684 |
117 | Benish Family Trust | Highland, WI 53543 | $30,468 |
118 | Charles R Wellington | Monroe, WI 53566 | $30,461 |
119 | Robert A Coogan | Mineral Point, WI 53565 | $30,171 |
120 | S And J Skemp Family LLC | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $30,137 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”