Total Commodity Programs in Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 113,162
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wisconsin totaled $7,848,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jerome J Laufenberg Inc | Alma Center, WI 54611 | $2,440,391 |
102 | Mulcahy Farms LLC | Dane, WI 53529 | $2,434,625 |
103 | Schairer Farms Inc | Birnamwood, WI 54414 | $2,430,272 |
104 | Schmidt's Ponderosa LLC | Bonduel, WI 54107 | $2,410,719 |
105 | El-na Farms LLC | Algoma, WI 54201 | $2,407,272 |
106 | Meadowlark Dairy LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $2,406,237 |
107 | Majestic Crossings Dairy LLC | Plymouth, WI 53073 | $2,401,480 |
108 | Clark View Farms LLC | Bagley, WI 53801 | $2,399,682 |
109 | Bomaz Inc | Hammond, WI 54015 | $2,395,216 |
110 | F W R Nell Farms Inc | Juneau, WI 53039 | $2,389,694 |
111 | So-fine Bovines LLC | Westfield, WI 53964 | $2,387,265 |
112 | Van Dyk Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $2,383,704 |
113 | Mlsna Dairy Supply Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $2,373,568 |
114 | Halleen Farms | Saint Paul, MN 55125 | $2,368,459 |
115 | Siegmann Farms Inc | Rubicon, WI 53078 | $2,367,258 |
116 | Pepst Farm Inc | Centuria, WI 54824 | $2,366,699 |
117 | Christiana Farms | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $2,363,741 |
118 | Katzman Farms Inc | Whitewater, WI 53190 | $2,359,793 |
119 | Hamp Haven Farms | Reedsville, WI 54230 | $2,349,901 |
120 | Sugar Creek Farm LLC | New London, WI 54961 | $2,349,304 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”