Total Disaster Programs in Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 37,591
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Wisconsin totaled $553,131,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | G Gerald Nelson | Mason, WI 54856 | $349,240 |
122 | Warren M Johnson | Osceola, WI 54020 | $347,453 |
123 | Lyrek Farms | Chetek, WI 54728 | $345,662 |
124 | Clyde And Donna Brunner | New Franken, WI 54229 | $345,244 |
125 | N & K Ginseng LLC | Schofield, WI 54476 | $345,114 |
126 | Collins Dairy LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $344,888 |
127 | Oneida Potato Exchange LLC | Rhinelander, WI 54501 | $342,035 |
128 | Brian T Long | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $339,817 |
129 | East Troy Sod Farms Inc | East Troy, WI 53120 | $337,717 |
130 | Van Wychen Farms | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $336,788 |
131 | Siemers Holstein Farm Inc | Newton, WI 53063 | $336,512 |
132 | Stodola Farms LLC | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $336,350 |
133 | Sokaogon Chippewa Community | Crandon, WI 54520 | $335,862 |
134 | Mark S Bula | Friendship, WI 53934 | $330,170 |
135 | Lake Nokomis Cranberries Inc | Eagle River, WI 54521 | $330,000 |
136 | , | $329,916 | |
137 | United Vision Dairy LLC | Mishicot, WI 54228 | $329,901 |
138 | Bradly George Schmidt | Shawano, WI 54166 | $324,551 |
139 | David R Faschingbauer | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $323,551 |
140 | Larsen Farms | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $321,802 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”