Farm Subsidy information
Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 140,662
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wisconsin totaled $11,669,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dean Kincaid Inc | Palmyra, WI 53156 | $3,186,597 |
42 | Kieler Farms Inc | Platteville, WI 53818 | $3,181,480 |
43 | Thunderbranch Acres Inc | Darlington, WI 53530 | $3,079,527 |
44 | Bach Farms LLC | Dorchester, WI 54425 | $3,077,291 |
45 | Stanley Rauls | De Forest, WI 53532 | $3,065,673 |
46 | Heartland Farms Inc | Hancock, WI 54943 | $3,046,326 |
47 | Kippley Farms | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $3,026,322 |
48 | Prairieland Dairy LLC | Belleville, WI 53508 | $2,967,717 |
49 | Roche Grain | Columbus, WI 53925 | $2,962,837 |
50 | Twin City Farms | Beloit, WI 53511 | $2,961,830 |
51 | Betley Farms LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $2,943,586 |
52 | Kratz Farms LLC | Slinger, WI 53086 | $2,919,151 |
53 | Ziegler Dairy Farms Inc | Middleton, WI 53562 | $2,918,969 |
54 | Schuh View Dairy LLC | Freedom, WI 54130 | $2,891,151 |
55 | Wysocki Produce Farm Inc | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $2,888,021 |
56 | Son-bow Farms Inc | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $2,876,319 |
57 | Riley Brothers | Mauston, WI 53948 | $2,864,186 |
58 | Triple K Farm | Hartland, WI 53029 | $2,863,678 |
59 | Van De Walle Farms LLC | Crivitz, WI 54114 | $2,861,579 |
60 | Double S Dairy LLC | Markesan, WI 53946 | $2,849,660 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”