Direct Payment Program in Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 59,305
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $1,191,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Metcalf Farms Partnership II | Janesville, WI 53546 | $562,430 |
42 | Jacobs Brothers | De Pere, WI 54115 | $560,787 |
43 | Keske And Keske | Brocton, IL 61917 | $544,214 |
44 | Shamrock Farms | Cross Plains, WI 53528 | $532,866 |
45 | Lynn Bros Ptr | Unity, WI 54488 | $525,661 |
46 | Alfa Lawn Farms LLC | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $521,190 |
47 | Woggon Farms | Camp Douglas, WI 54618 | $518,093 |
48 | Da-ran Dairy | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $501,954 |
49 | S&l Farms | Hammond, WI 54015 | $481,016 |
50 | Schroeder Farms Ptnshp | Deforest, WI 53532 | $476,446 |
51 | S & S Grain Farms Partnership | Rio, WI 53960 | $467,857 |
52 | Kratz Farms LLC | Slinger, WI 53086 | $467,325 |
53 | Double R Farms Inc | Osceola, WI 54020 | $457,701 |
54 | John Edward Storck | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $456,609 |
55 | Slama Farms LLC | La Valle, WI 53941 | $456,144 |
56 | K&b Farms Partnership | Westby, WI 54667 | $452,413 |
57 | Kurey Brothers Llp | Appleton, WI 54913 | $451,008 |
58 | Van Der Geest Dairy Cattle Inc | Merrill, WI 54452 | $449,827 |
59 | B J Lapacinski And Sons Inc | Rice Lake, WI 54868 | $449,376 |
60 | Ter Rae Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $449,297 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”