Loan Deficiency in Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 41,671
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Wisconsin totaled $721,522,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sedelbauer Farms Inc | Hixton, WI 54635 | $364,090 |
42 | Timothy R Leidig | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $358,154 |
43 | Bahr Farms Inc | Belmont, WI 53510 | $357,613 |
44 | Schram Farms | Berlin, WI 54923 | $356,044 |
45 | Paul E Olsen | Wautoma, WI 54982 | $352,775 |
46 | D & D Partnership C/o Dan Dumke | Markesan, WI 53946 | $349,886 |
47 | Hatlen Brothers Partnership | Evansville, WI 53536 | $348,749 |
48 | Furseth Bros Real Estate Partnership | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $348,386 |
49 | Larson Acres Inc | Evansville, WI 53536 | $346,592 |
50 | Mullikin Farms Partnership | Janesville, WI 53546 | $346,082 |
51 | L Romanowski Corp | Stanley, WI 54768 | $345,361 |
52 | Howard G Hartmann | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $344,840 |
53 | Steven J Voda | Janesville, WI 53546 | $344,351 |
54 | Nehls Bros Farms Ltd | Juneau, WI 53039 | $343,856 |
55 | Fenrich Farms Inc | Evansville, WI 53536 | $343,220 |
56 | Double T & D Grain Inc | Platteville, WI 53818 | $343,062 |
57 | Lynn Bros Ptr | Unity, WI 54488 | $342,469 |
58 | Ter Rae Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $338,213 |
59 | Hamlin Valley Farms Inc | Strum, WI 54770 | $336,399 |
60 | William M Overbeck | Sturgeon Bay, WI 54235 | $336,309 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”