Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 25,694
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wisconsin totaled $559,278,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Majestic Crossings Dairy LLC | Sheboygan Falls, WI 53085 | $374,621 |
42 | Andy F Bensend | Dallas, WI 54733 | $374,413 |
43 | Bach Farms LLC | Dorchester, WI 54425 | $374,040 |
44 | Zahn Farms Cropping | Gillett, WI 54124 | $373,417 |
45 | Statz Bros Inc | Marshall, WI 53559 | $368,286 |
46 | Wolf L & G Farms LLC | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $367,819 |
47 | Roe Farms Partnership | Monticello, WI 53570 | $367,752 |
48 | L Romanowski Corp | Stanley, WI 54768 | $366,399 |
49 | Riesterer Farms Llp | Milton, WI 53563 | $360,658 |
50 | Ringa-lea Farms Inc | Barronett, WI 54813 | $354,456 |
51 | Dean Kincaid Inc | Palmyra, WI 53156 | $352,308 |
52 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $350,594 |
53 | Cross Farms LLC | Oshkosh, WI 54904 | $350,160 |
54 | Bader Brothers Enterprises | Monroe, WI 53566 | $348,587 |
55 | Mlsna Dairy Supply Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $348,131 |
56 | Hamlin Valley Farms Inc | Strum, WI 54770 | $347,050 |
57 | O'leary Gunn Farms | Janesville, WI 53548 | $346,488 |
58 | Mahr Brothers LLC | Stanley, WI 54768 | $344,639 |
59 | Tinedale Cropping | Wrightstown, WI 54180 | $343,245 |
60 | Thunderbranch Acres Inc | Darlington, WI 53530 | $341,174 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”