Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 140
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Wisconsin totaled $5,191,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Bula-gieringer Farms II LLC | Coloma, WI 54930 | $4,842 |
62 | Robert J Schindlbeck | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $4,731 |
63 | Marion Realty Ltd Inc | Friendship, WI 53934 | $4,351 |
64 | Robert Wood | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $4,231 |
65 | John Wikman | Friendship, WI 53934 | $4,055 |
66 | Douglas E Strupp | Hancock, WI 54943 | $3,940 |
67 | James E Bays | Adams, WI 53910 | $3,868 |
68 | Jeffrey A Nehrkorn | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $3,855 |
69 | Discovery Land Co., LLC | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $3,495 |
70 | Ronald A Grabarski | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $3,476 |
71 | Rebecca Grabarski | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $3,429 |
72 | Arloine H Carlson | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $3,334 |
73 | Richard Grabarski | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $3,259 |
74 | Neal Allan Turner | Portage, WI 53901 | $3,228 |
75 | Catherine A Grabarski | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $3,199 |
76 | Myron H Byers - Byers Trust Dated July 31, 1992 | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $3,125 |
77 | Anatoly Nepscha | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $3,061 |
78 | Craig Wood | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $2,882 |
79 | Jacob H Huber | Oxford, WI 53952 | $2,783 |
80 | Mavis C Pfister | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $2,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”