Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 937
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Wisconsin totaled $102,097,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | , | $113,968 | |
82 | Chris O Riley | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $112,244 |
83 | Francis J Pokorney | Mauston, WI 53948 | $110,991 |
84 | Gene Bula | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $110,594 |
85 | Timothy D Ems | Oxford, WI 53952 | $110,276 |
86 | Prairie Vista Cranberries LLC | Amherst Jct, WI 54407 | $109,485 |
87 | Rosedale Genetics Ltd | Oxford, WI 53952 | $109,320 |
88 | James E Breene | Adams, WI 53910 | $109,283 |
89 | Gilbert D Jensen | Briggsville, WI 53920 | $105,439 |
90 | Paramount Ag Inc | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $104,457 |
91 | Daniel J Pokorney | Mauston, WI 53948 | $103,586 |
92 | Melford L Bressler | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $103,510 |
93 | Ronald Hugh Keach | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $102,953 |
94 | Catherine A Grabarski | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $101,433 |
95 | Paul Sheldon Pfister | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $99,384 |
96 | Myron H Byers - Byers Trust Dated July 31, 1992 | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $98,795 |
97 | Johnson Brothers | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $97,694 |
98 | Scott Mcfarlin | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $95,193 |
99 | Daniel J Mcfarlin | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $95,193 |
100 | Loren L Kaye | Friendship, WI 53934 | $93,469 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”