Market Loss Assistance Program in Adams County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 424
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Adams County, Wisconsin totaled $3,160,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Roland Jensen | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $5,894 |
122 | Norbert Nawrot | Adams, WI 53910 | $5,876 |
123 | Joseph E Seis | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $5,806 |
124 | Dwaine Hays | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $5,729 |
125 | Dennis Volkening | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $5,653 |
126 | Harry Hazel | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $5,581 |
127 | Thomas J King | Oxford, WI 53952 | $5,329 |
128 | Scott E Kotlowski | Friendship, WI 53934 | $5,303 |
129 | Kenneth Dehmlow | Friendship, WI 53934 | $5,278 |
130 | Leo Jerome | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $5,130 |
131 | Neal Stone | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $5,092 |
132 | Harold Seiler | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $5,083 |
133 | Dennis Coon | Melbourne, AR 72556 | $5,053 |
134 | Henry S Jacobs Jr | Westfield, WI 53964 | $4,730 |
135 | Jesus Rene' Castellanos | Hoffman Estates, IL 60194 | $4,663 |
136 | Charles C Anderson | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $4,652 |
137 | Sammie Baggs | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $4,645 |
138 | Darwin Nelson | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $4,549 |
139 | Edward John Gorny | Riverwoods, IL 60015 | $4,516 |
140 | Jane Northway | Edina, MN 55435 | $4,492 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”