Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 181
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Wisconsin totaled $8,294,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Scott Kotlowski | Friendship, WI 53934 | $56,511 |
22 | Lloyd C Bork | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $56,176 |
23 | Kevin J Jensen | Portage, WI 53901 | $51,280 |
24 | James J Nawrot | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $49,287 |
25 | Double G Dairy LLC | Friendship, WI 53934 | $46,198 |
26 | Roland Jensen | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $46,043 |
27 | Weaver Dairy Farm | Friendship, WI 53934 | $45,774 |
28 | Robert M Holley Dba Mike Holley F | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $43,165 |
29 | Daniel R Grabarski | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $37,288 |
30 | John R Jefferson | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $35,836 |
31 | Nichols Enterprises Inc | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $35,786 |
32 | Bartsch Farms | Hancock, WI 54943 | $35,404 |
33 | Joshua Jeffrey Anderson | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $27,044 |
34 | John Wikman | Friendship, WI 53934 | $25,952 |
35 | Cloverview Farms | Oxford, WI 53952 | $25,521 |
36 | Rian M Hammerly | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $23,411 |
37 | James E Bays II | Adams, WI 53910 | $23,239 |
38 | Andre D Weaver | Friendship, WI 53934 | $23,212 |
39 | Charles Arthur Church | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $20,401 |
40 | Michael Keach | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $20,343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”