Farm Subsidy information
Ashland County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Ashland County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 223
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ashland County, Wisconsin totaled $13,811,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Kerri K Pearce | Dalton, WI 53926 | $7,002 |
102 | M Jolma Inc | Marengo, WI 54855 | $6,427 |
103 | Walter Amsler | Butternut, WI 54514 | $6,370 |
104 | Stanley Rybak Jr | Butternut, WI 54514 | $6,336 |
105 | Edward S Rybak | Butternut, WI 54514 | $6,336 |
106 | Rodney Sederholm | High Bridge, WI 54846 | $6,290 |
107 | Paul B Bucheger | Butternut, WI 54514 | $6,260 |
108 | Arnold G Lumberg | Ashland, WI 54806 | $6,230 |
109 | Kent Johansson | Glidden, WI 54527 | $6,062 |
110 | Josh W Polencheck | Mellen, WI 54546 | $6,002 |
111 | Raymond T Polencheck | Glidden, WI 54527 | $5,507 |
112 | , | $5,394 | |
113 | Dale E Berweger | Ashland, WI 54806 | $5,253 |
114 | Michael I Mikrot Jr | South Range, WI 54874 | $5,225 |
115 | Alan James Lindquist | High Bridge, WI 54846 | $5,101 |
116 | Allen F Hannemann | Glidden, WI 54527 | $5,021 |
117 | Melissa Fischbach | Ashland, WI 54806 | $5,016 |
118 | Doug Thorp Services LLC | Glidden, WI 54527 | $4,864 |
119 | Robert L Peck | Ashland, WI 54806 | $4,847 |
120 | Arnold Mackey | High Bridge, WI 54846 | $4,464 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”