Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Bayfield County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Bayfield County, Wisconsin totaled $48,447 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul D Miller | Mason, WI 54856 | $913 |
22 | Lee G Kavajecz | Port Wing, WI 54865 | $889 |
23 | Thomas M Zepczyk Sr | Mason, WI 54856 | $832 |
24 | Theodore E Mika | Mason, WI 54856 | $762 |
25 | William A Johnson | Ashland, WI 54806 | $749 |
26 | John Henry Mesik | Mason, WI 54856 | $719 |
27 | Thomas L Davies | Port Wing, WI 54865 | $712 |
28 | Kim M Pearce | Ashland, WI 54806 | $710 |
29 | Victoria R Elonen | Iron River, WI 54847 | $662 |
30 | Craig A Coffland | Ashland, WI 54806 | $638 |
31 | Larry L Fickbohm | Port Wing, WI 54865 | $549 |
32 | Jennifer A Augustine | Ashland, WI 54806 | $530 |
33 | Kevin M Tetzner | Washburn, WI 54891 | $515 |
34 | Gregory E Tetzner | Washburn, WI 54891 | $515 |
35 | Kenneth E Tyykila | Iron River, WI 54847 | $485 |
36 | Kathleen L Sande | Ashland, WI 54806 | $463 |
37 | Brad Michael Gwidt | Mason, WI 54856 | $451 |
38 | Jameson W Hecimovich | Mason, WI 54856 | $434 |
39 | Nicholas David Oreskovich | Mason, WI 54856 | $367 |
40 | Northern Holsteins, LLC | Mason, WI 54856 | $298 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”