Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Brown County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 642
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Brown County, Wisconsin totaled $67,486 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Loren R Vander Kinter | De Pere, WI 54115 | $140 |
62 | Dean J Abts | New Franken, WI 54229 | $137 |
63 | Clyde And Donna Brunner | New Franken, WI 54229 | $135 |
64 | Ervin E Kerkhoff | De Pere, WI 54115 | $131 |
65 | Emerald Acres | De Pere, WI 54115 | $126 |
66 | Alan M Borley | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $124 |
67 | David J Van Rite | De Pere, WI 54115 | $123 |
68 | Hutjens Maple Grove Dairy LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $123 |
69 | Keith John Vander Linden | De Pere, WI 54115 | $123 |
70 | Robert Erdmann | De Pere, WI 54115 | $122 |
71 | Bruce Vande Hey | Wrightstown, WI 54180 | $121 |
72 | Janet M Bodart | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $121 |
73 | Phillipsland Dairy Farm | Green Bay, WI 54311 | $118 |
74 | L N E Dairy Farm | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $116 |
75 | Alan J Vandenhouten | New Franken, WI 54229 | $116 |
76 | Thomas Vandenhouten | New Franken, WI 54229 | $116 |
77 | Katherine F Vander Kinter | De Pere, WI 54115 | $113 |
78 | Bernard Edward Van Den Plas | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $112 |
79 | Michael Nooyen | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $112 |
80 | Doloris Rita Van Den Plas | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $112 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”