Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Brown County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 355
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Brown County, Wisconsin totaled $2,218,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James G Seidl | New Franken, WI 54229 | $6,575 |
82 | Daniel J Leick | De Pere, WI 54115 | $6,436 |
83 | Zachary J Lacenski | Denmark, WI 54208 | $6,269 |
84 | Diny Veal Beef And Elk LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $6,209 |
85 | Robert L Juneau | Denmark, WI 54208 | $6,122 |
86 | Laabs Holsteins, LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $6,103 |
87 | Randy Virlee | New Franken, WI 54229 | $6,076 |
88 | Kent And Sandra Petersen | Denmark, WI 54208 | $5,977 |
89 | Russell George Allen | De Pere, WI 54115 | $5,951 |
90 | Keith Joseph Abts | New Franken, WI 54229 | $5,938 |
91 | Vander Linden Farms LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $5,868 |
92 | James E Wavrunek | Denmark, WI 54208 | $5,836 |
93 | Glenn Rentmeester | Denmark, WI 54208 | $5,830 |
94 | Dobberpuhl Farms LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $5,802 |
95 | Alvin R Beyer | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $5,732 |
96 | John P Leick | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $5,573 |
97 | Golden Rail Dairy LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $5,508 |
98 | Nick Van Gheem Farms LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $5,494 |
99 | Jft Grain Farm LLC | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $5,487 |
100 | John H Van Deurzen | De Pere, WI 54115 | $5,473 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”