Total Conservation Programs in Buffalo County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 170
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Buffalo County, Wisconsin totaled $568,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Web-low Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $2,922 |
62 | Lynn M Kupietz | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $2,718 |
63 | Herman Hoesley Jr | Roberts, WI 54023 | $2,717 |
64 | Laurie A Church | West St Paul, MN 55118 | $2,717 |
65 | Michael Robelia | Durand, WI 54736 | $2,710 |
66 | Survivors Trust Of Robert C Mcclyman And Joan M Mc | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $2,683 |
67 | Rosenholm Dairy Llp | Cochrane, WI 54622 | $2,558 |
68 | Marcel J Kulas | Alma, WI 54610 | $2,554 |
69 | Charles H Schultz | Alma, WI 54610 | $2,503 |
70 | Richard Bagniewski | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $2,461 |
71 | Gerald Rucinski | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $2,450 |
72 | Mark Van Acker | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $2,450 |
73 | Donald A Roessler | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,439 |
74 | Mark N Antonneau | Grafton, WI 53024 | $2,387 |
75 | Jon L Antonneau | Racine, WI 53402 | $2,387 |
76 | Marianna Byman | Winona, MN 55987 | $2,355 |
77 | David W Pfeiffer | Winthrop Harbor, IL 60096 | $2,257 |
78 | , | $2,156 | |
79 | Wald Brothers Partnership | Alma, WI 54610 | $2,138 |
80 | Frederic J Wicka | Bayfield, CO 81122 | $2,109 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”