Farm Subsidy information
Buffalo County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Buffalo County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,588
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Buffalo County, Wisconsin totaled $178,312,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mark G Denk | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $360,261 |
82 | James F Patzner | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $357,610 |
83 | Hunger Farms | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $350,589 |
84 | Baker's Acres Inc | Cochrane, WI 54622 | $350,092 |
85 | Werner A Engel Jr | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $349,903 |
86 | Senn Brothers Partnership | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $341,921 |
87 | Clifford Buchholz | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $335,397 |
88 | David L Pfund | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $331,638 |
89 | Debra S Kamla | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $328,932 |
90 | Winding Creek Acres Inc | Independence, WI 54747 | $326,796 |
91 | Robert Tuxen | Cochrane, WI 54622 | $325,840 |
92 | Myron G Bork | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $320,702 |
93 | De-lollypop Dairy Ltd | Mondovi, WI 54755 | $317,714 |
94 | Rotering Ridge Farms LLC | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $315,756 |
95 | Douglas A Guenther | Independence, WI 54747 | $315,599 |
96 | Gerard Weisenbeck | Durand, WI 54736 | $303,202 |
97 | William M Bremer | Independence, WI 54747 | $302,429 |
98 | Wald Brothers Partnership | Alma, WI 54610 | $302,219 |
99 | Daniel Weisenbeck | Durand, WI 54736 | $301,579 |
100 | Brad Reuter | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $301,148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”