Farm Subsidy information
Buffalo County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Buffalo County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 301
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Buffalo County, Wisconsin totaled $4,514,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Greshik Farms LLC | Cochrane, WI 54622 | $4,855 |
82 | Tom Salwey | Independence, WI 54747 | $4,828 |
83 | Ernst Bluff Farms LLC | Alma, WI 54610 | $4,755 |
84 | Leonard E Schaub | Black Earth, WI 53515 | $4,692 |
85 | The Neitzel Farm Legacy Trust Of 2021 | Afton, MN 55001 | $4,609 |
86 | Buffalo County Hunters | Alma, WI 54610 | $4,541 |
87 | Thomas J Hunger | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $4,511 |
88 | Nathan F Brandt | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $4,343 |
89 | Barbara Fernholz | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $4,210 |
90 | Dale L Nuzum | Alma, WI 54610 | $4,147 |
91 | Brett Evans | Nelson, WI 54756 | $4,119 |
92 | Steven J Losinski | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $4,060 |
93 | Gerald V Waara | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $4,040 |
94 | Robert Sendelbach | Cochrane, WI 54622 | $3,997 |
95 | Jason W Schaffner | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $3,992 |
96 | Richard D Wachowiak | Muskego, WI 53150 | $3,985 |
97 | Reidt Family Farms Inc | Alma, WI 54610 | $3,890 |
98 | David Scharmer | Fountain City, WI 54629 | $3,789 |
99 | Swinn Valley Acres LLC | Arcadia, WI 54612 | $3,746 |
100 | Zachary L Strain | Eleva, WI 54738 | $3,730 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”