Total Commodity Programs in Calumet County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 431
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Calumet County, Wisconsin totaled $7,833,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Meyer Brothers Crop Farms | Chilton, WI 53014 | $41,419 |
62 | Groeschl Contour Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $39,698 |
63 | John B Kurscheidt | Chilton, WI 53014 | $39,317 |
64 | Stonybrook Farms LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $36,963 |
65 | Leaves Inspired Tree Nursery LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $36,939 |
66 | Norbert Gebhart | Chilton, WI 53014 | $35,328 |
67 | Michael Schneider | Brillion, WI 54110 | $35,041 |
68 | Gregory S Bohman | Brillion, WI 54110 | $34,316 |
69 | James Casper | Chilton, WI 53014 | $33,407 |
70 | Geiser Dairy Farms LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $32,072 |
71 | Southwood Dairy Farm LLC | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $31,312 |
72 | Anthony C Kempen | Brillion, WI 54110 | $30,553 |
73 | Randolph Koehler | Chilton, WI 53014 | $30,370 |
74 | Nicholas C Lisowe | Chilton, WI 53014 | $29,232 |
75 | Forest Brook Farms LLC-jay P Juckem | Chilton, WI 53014 | $28,089 |
76 | Schneider Farms Real Estate | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $27,538 |
77 | City View Dairy LLC | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $27,064 |
78 | James Kurscheidt | Chilton, WI 53014 | $26,428 |
79 | Meyer Farms Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $26,245 |
80 | Martin A Lisowe Farms Inc | Malone, WI 53049 | $26,103 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”