Farm Subsidy information
Calumet County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Calumet County, Wisconsin, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 191
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calumet County, Wisconsin totaled $7,757,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bon-home Livestock LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,919 |
82 | David M Schneider | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,490 |
83 | Chad Roehrig | Brillion, WI 54110 | $3,193 |
84 | Winnebago East Shore Conservation | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,167 |
85 | Charles Bares | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $3,063 |
86 | Patricia Gasch | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,876 |
87 | Blake Robert Schneider | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,750 |
88 | Steve Krueger | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,580 |
89 | Fredrich C Popp | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $2,467 |
90 | Vernon L Gasch Dba Heritage Orcha | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,467 |
91 | , | $2,413 | |
92 | Carl Daun | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $2,403 |
93 | Hanke's Rock Bottom Family Farm LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,251 |
94 | Dennis J Roehrig | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $2,203 |
95 | Paul Peters | Sherwood, WI 54169 | $2,174 |
96 | Charles Sabel | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,121 |
97 | J Karls Farms LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,058 |
98 | Cedar Farms LLC | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $2,030 |
99 | David De Bruin | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $2,015 |
100 | , | $1,992 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”