Deficiency Payment in Calumet County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 353
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Calumet County, Wisconsin totaled $861,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas Mertens | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,303 |
82 | Robert Bonlander | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,294 |
83 | Grand View Dairy Farm Inc | Brillion, WI 54110 | $3,252 |
84 | Gervase & Paul Meyers | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,248 |
85 | Robert M Meyer | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $3,243 |
86 | Clarence Biese | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,235 |
87 | Woodview Farm Inc | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $3,227 |
88 | Kenneth O Hedrich | Brillion, WI 54110 | $3,220 |
89 | Bittner Frms Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,216 |
90 | Ralph Hopfensperger | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $3,205 |
91 | Richard Kestell | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $3,140 |
92 | Dean A Bergelin | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $3,104 |
93 | Aebischer Farms Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $3,042 |
94 | Maile Brothers | Brillion, WI 54110 | $3,017 |
95 | Craig Thiel | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $2,986 |
96 | Meyer Farms Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,980 |
97 | Tim Kleist | Brillion, WI 54110 | $2,980 |
98 | Simon Geiger | Brillion, WI 54110 | $2,965 |
99 | Devlynn Corp | Chilton, WI 53014 | $2,959 |
100 | Norman Eickert Jr | Brillion, WI 54110 | $2,941 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”