Farm Subsidy information
Calumet County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Calumet County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,463
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calumet County, Wisconsin totaled $160,237,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dallmann Farms Inc | Brillion, WI 54110 | $905,754 |
22 | Martin A Lisowe Farms Inc | Malone, WI 53049 | $894,503 |
23 | Kohlman Dairy LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $880,626 |
24 | Meyerhofer Dairy Llp | Menasha, WI 54952 | $841,233 |
25 | Tri-county Farms | Brillion, WI 54110 | $840,162 |
26 | Meyer Dairy & Grain Farm Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $837,658 |
27 | Biese Farms LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $828,404 |
28 | Kesler Farms | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $814,328 |
29 | John Levash | Brillion, WI 54110 | $811,169 |
30 | James Casper | Chilton, WI 53014 | $808,824 |
31 | Sprangers Brothers | Menasha, WI 54952 | $800,862 |
32 | Feider Farms LLC | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $800,739 |
33 | Brian W Horn | Brillion, WI 54110 | $795,837 |
34 | Donald Pfister | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $749,014 |
35 | Stonybrook Farms LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $747,147 |
36 | Ronald E Ditter | Chilton, WI 53014 | $706,495 |
37 | Meyer Farms Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $706,236 |
38 | Ronald Biese | Chilton, WI 53014 | $654,231 |
39 | Maple Grove Dairy | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $652,911 |
40 | Meyer Dairy & Grain Farm Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $629,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”