Direct Payment Program in Calumet County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 699
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Calumet County, Wisconsin totaled $16,195,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Nathan Schnell | Brillion, WI 54110 | $134,884 |
22 | Tinedale Cropping | Wrightstown, WI 54180 | $129,744 |
23 | Woelfel Farms Inc | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $129,695 |
24 | East Shore Dairy LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $129,123 |
25 | Jay P Juckem | Chilton, WI 53014 | $125,794 |
26 | Pfister Farms | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $120,898 |
27 | Kesler Farms | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $120,397 |
28 | Craig Hedrich | Brillion, WI 54110 | $119,042 |
29 | Rivers Bend Dairy LLC | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $116,983 |
30 | Wenzel Hilltop Dairy LLC | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $116,982 |
31 | Matt Lavey Farms Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $113,245 |
32 | John N Mueller | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $111,009 |
33 | Maple Grove Dairy | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $110,871 |
34 | Meyer Farms Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $108,477 |
35 | Grand View Dairy Farm Inc | Brillion, WI 54110 | $107,688 |
36 | Randolph Koehler | Chilton, WI 53014 | $105,825 |
37 | Sprangers Brothers | Menasha, WI 54952 | $99,528 |
38 | Groeschl Contour Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $92,564 |
39 | John Mueller Farms LLC | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $92,350 |
40 | Robert Propson | Menasha, WI 54952 | $91,943 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”