Production Flexibility Program in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,564
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $13,846,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lewis Farms Of New Auburn Inc | New Auburn, WI 54757 | $45,453 |
42 | Duane H Crank | Cadott, WI 54727 | $45,307 |
43 | Daniel G Stiehl | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $45,262 |
44 | Dean Charles Ruff | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $44,278 |
45 | Leduc Farms | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $44,048 |
46 | Len-don Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $43,872 |
47 | Harms Farms Inc | Jim Falls, WI 54748 | $43,593 |
48 | Rasmus Farms | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $43,551 |
49 | Steven John Derks | Boyd, WI 54726 | $42,907 |
50 | Ronald B Patrie | Cadott, WI 54727 | $41,705 |
51 | John J Derks | Boyd, WI 54726 | $41,632 |
52 | Robert F Seibel | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $41,171 |
53 | Eckwright Brothers, LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $40,934 |
54 | Larry C Marquardt | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $40,429 |
55 | Robert J Laird | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $40,110 |
56 | Todd A Fanetti | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $39,372 |
57 | Michael P Ruff | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $38,845 |
58 | Joseph Michels | Colfax, WI 54730 | $38,522 |
59 | Kenneth August Bjork | Colfax, WI 54730 | $38,046 |
60 | Janet Rogge | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $37,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”