Total Commodity Programs in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,078
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $158,602,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Earl E Stanek | Gilman, WI 54433 | $447,679 |
62 | Clyde L Bowe | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $446,050 |
63 | Weber Farm Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $436,374 |
64 | John G Herrick | Boyd, WI 54726 | $436,347 |
65 | Peter R Hanson | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $428,499 |
66 | Sandy Acres Dairy | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $427,865 |
67 | Rasmus Farms | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $425,381 |
68 | Duncan Creek Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $421,402 |
69 | Maier Family Dairy LLC | Jim Falls, WI 54748 | $419,448 |
70 | Jeffrey P Menard | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $413,522 |
71 | Solberg Farms LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $411,553 |
72 | Echo Brook Farms Inc | Colfax, WI 54730 | $411,252 |
73 | Woodruff Farms | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $410,580 |
74 | L Romanowski Corp | Stanley, WI 54768 | $409,982 |
75 | Mark W Blaha | New Auburn, WI 54757 | $405,327 |
76 | Scott R Mohr | Holcombe, WI 54745 | $397,323 |
77 | Matthew J Nunes | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $397,277 |
78 | George A Polzin | Cadott, WI 54727 | $390,716 |
79 | Suvada Brothers | Colfax, WI 54730 | $388,211 |
80 | Susan M Wall | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $384,534 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”