Farm Subsidy information
Chippewa County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 691
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $17,832,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Frederick C Bohl | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $15,310 |
162 | Adams Valley View Dairy Inc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $15,248 |
163 | Sandy Acres Dairy LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $15,228 |
164 | Steven B Daken | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $15,209 |
165 | Larry J Hanna | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $14,931 |
166 | Richard B Lofthus | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $14,849 |
167 | Scott T Pozarski | Cadott, WI 54727 | $14,471 |
168 | Brian G Wozniak | Stanley, WI 54768 | $14,304 |
169 | Rosenbrook Dairy | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $14,278 |
170 | Bruce A Ramseier Sr | Cadott, WI 54727 | $14,218 |
171 | Seidlitz Dairy Farm Inc | Jim Falls, WI 54748 | $14,195 |
172 | Thomas J Nesvacil | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $14,092 |
173 | Richard R Sedlacek | Cornell, WI 54732 | $14,046 |
174 | Scott P Schindler | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $13,988 |
175 | Deatra Mary Lazarz | Jim Falls, WI 54748 | $13,959 |
176 | Dahlka Farms | New Auburn, WI 54757 | $13,919 |
177 | Beaudette Farms Inc | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $13,469 |
178 | Thomas Moos Dba Moos Farms | New Auburn, WI 54757 | $13,428 |
179 | S & S Custom Farming LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $13,403 |
180 | Ronald D Kragness | Colfax, WI 54730 | $13,363 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”