Farm Subsidy information
Chippewa County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 691
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $17,832,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kenealy Dairy Farms | Cadott, WI 54727 | $240,932 |
2 | Lagesse Dairy Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $218,632 |
3 | Douglas T Danielson | Cadott, WI 54727 | $190,482 |
4 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $186,221 |
5 | Arrowhead Farms Partnership | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $175,791 |
6 | Solberg Dairy Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $175,389 |
7 | Gilbertson Farms Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $171,305 |
8 | Close Harvesting LLC | Cadott, WI 54727 | $169,635 |
9 | Red Cedar Honey Farms LLC | New Auburn, WI 54757 | $166,910 |
10 | Lnb Farms LLC | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $164,191 |
11 | Donald D Klisiewicz | Stanley, WI 54768 | $162,002 |
12 | Hilger Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $160,330 |
13 | Mahr Brothers LLC | Stanley, WI 54768 | $157,687 |
14 | Dd Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $156,258 |
15 | Backhaus Acres LLC | Boyd, WI 54726 | $154,746 |
16 | Wilichowski Farms LLC | Boyd, WI 54726 | $153,108 |
17 | Triple T Farms LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $146,288 |
18 | Dribble Ridge Dairy | Colfax, WI 54730 | $146,195 |
19 | Ksm Farms LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $140,151 |
20 | Daniel M Holub | Boyd, WI 54726 | $136,278 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>