Total Commodity Programs in Chippewa County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,069
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chippewa County, Wisconsin totaled $152,048,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Harms Farms Inc | Jim Falls, WI 54748 | $838,804 |
22 | Dd Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $836,448 |
23 | Triple T Farms LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $832,132 |
24 | Judith A Faschingbauer | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $822,652 |
25 | Daniel G Stiehl | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $808,352 |
26 | Dribble Ridge Dairy | Colfax, WI 54730 | $802,336 |
27 | H & H Farms | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $776,897 |
28 | Close Harvesting LLC | Cadott, WI 54727 | $771,920 |
29 | Len-don Farms Inc | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $740,844 |
30 | Solberg Dairy Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $717,658 |
31 | North Road Dairy LLC | Colfax, WI 54730 | $712,789 |
32 | Cdr Farms LLC | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $703,803 |
33 | Hh Family Farms LLC | Bloomer, WI 54724 | $698,327 |
34 | Bruce J Derks | Boyd, WI 54726 | $688,888 |
35 | Daniel M Holub | Boyd, WI 54726 | $686,617 |
36 | Valley Beau Farms | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $665,899 |
37 | Gary Menard | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $606,037 |
38 | Backhaus Acres LLC | Boyd, WI 54726 | $598,291 |
39 | Steinmetz Farms, LLC | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $583,539 |
40 | Keith S Dachel | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $577,795 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”