Farm Subsidy information
Crawford County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Crawford County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,029
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crawford County, Wisconsin totaled $114,496,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Fritz Bros | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $205,727 |
82 | Patrick J Erdenberger | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $204,846 |
83 | Wedeberg Farms Inc | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $204,598 |
84 | Dean Lenzendorf | Eastman, WI 54626 | $197,652 |
85 | Shiloh LLC | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $195,771 |
86 | Bradley J Linder | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $190,370 |
87 | Moravits Brothers | Bloomington, WI 53804 | $188,010 |
88 | Till-bec Acres | Soldiers Grove, WI 54655 | $187,437 |
89 | Zinkle Dairy LLC | Steuben, WI 54657 | $184,426 |
90 | Howard Roth | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $182,719 |
91 | Cardinal Investments | Cedarburg, WI 53012 | $182,542 |
92 | Daniel J Mccormick | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $179,937 |
93 | Mark E Schlee | Eastman, WI 54626 | $178,679 |
94 | Jody Riley | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $178,634 |
95 | Robert A Mitchell | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $176,483 |
96 | Daniel J Roberts | Eastman, WI 54626 | $176,099 |
97 | Gary L Allan | Seneca, WI 54654 | $174,258 |
98 | Richard Zinkle | Steuben, WI 54657 | $172,149 |
99 | Norman Werthwein | Soldiers Grove, WI 54655 | $171,690 |
100 | James F Hillman Sr | German Valley, IL 61039 | $170,109 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”