Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Crawford County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 359
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Crawford County, Wisconsin totaled $4,334,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Greg Barnum | Lake Forest, IL 60045 | $7,751 |
122 | Stuckey Farm | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $7,726 |
123 | Gary J Kozelka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $7,566 |
124 | Michael A Mullikin | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $7,539 |
125 | Marfilius Farms Llp | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $7,407 |
126 | Matthew T Kearns | Eastman, WI 54626 | $7,338 |
127 | Bryan Cody | Eastman, WI 54626 | $7,180 |
128 | Randall L Moret | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $7,147 |
129 | Dennis D Rider | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $7,137 |
130 | Timothy G Steger | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $7,076 |
131 | Terence M Steger | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $7,075 |
132 | Gary Tainter | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $7,043 |
133 | Hill Crest Acres LLC | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $6,982 |
134 | Greg E Oppriecht | Eastman, WI 54626 | $6,944 |
135 | Schwert Farms | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $6,871 |
136 | Daniel J Roberts | Eastman, WI 54626 | $6,835 |
137 | Bradley A Schlee | Eastman, WI 54626 | $6,806 |
138 | Allbee Farm Limited Partnership | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $6,778 |
139 | Samuel J Tesar Jr | Eastman, WI 54626 | $6,760 |
140 | Jacob L Aspenson | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $6,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”