Farm Subsidy information
Crawford County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Crawford County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 579
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crawford County, Wisconsin totaled $6,448,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lomas Farms LLC | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $43,493 |
22 | Kristopher 'swede' A Knutson | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $42,335 |
23 | Brent M Sander | Boscobel, WI 53805 | $40,854 |
24 | Donald J Boland | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $40,109 |
25 | Hill N Vale Acres Inc | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $39,454 |
26 | Lowell Kapinus | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $38,868 |
27 | Alan J Hromadka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $37,991 |
28 | Busy B Farms Inc | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $37,891 |
29 | James A Moret | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $37,663 |
30 | Jeffrey D Parr | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $33,928 |
31 | Loren Fishler | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $32,920 |
32 | Rolling S Farms LLC | Bagley, WI 53801 | $32,725 |
33 | Ervin H Eick | Ferryville, WI 54628 | $31,053 |
34 | Chad A Sime | Gays Mills, WI 54631 | $29,779 |
35 | Gerald Oppriecht | Eastman, WI 54626 | $29,577 |
36 | Richard John Larsen Jr | Wauzeka, WI 53826 | $28,719 |
37 | Larry E Kapinus Sr | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $28,439 |
38 | Thomas J Kozelka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $28,106 |
39 | Janet E Kozelka | Prairie Du Chien, WI 53821 | $28,106 |
40 | Aspenson Farms Inc | Eastman, WI 54626 | $28,082 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”